#166 closed defect (invalid)
jhalfs install stopped in chroot/e2fsprogs
Reported by: | Brunno | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | CLFS Standard 1.2.0 |
Component: | BOOK | Version: | CLFS Standard 1.2.0 |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
I'm trying install development version of CLFS and its stops in this point:
make[2]: Entrando no diretório `/mnt/sis/jhalfs'
Building target 082-e2fsprogs [++++++++++++++++++++++\ls: impossível acessar /sources/e2fsprogs-1.40.4.tar.gz: Arquivo ou diretório não encontrado
+tar: a opção exige um argumento -- f
|Try
tar --help' or
tar --usage' for more information.
make[2]: [082-e2fsprogs] Erro 1 make[2]: Saindo do diretório `/mnt/sis/jhalfs' make[1]: [mk_SUDO] Erro 2 make[1]: Saindo do diretório `/mnt/sis/jhalfs'
<jhalfs 2.3.1> exit
This means that its failed to find the package and was not past his name for tar program, but the file is in the directory, but the symbolic link /sources -> /mnt/sis/sources, isn't created. I make the link but it's stops against:
jhalfs [ /mnt/sis/jhalfs ]$ make make[1]: Entrando no diretório `/mnt/sis/jhalfs'
Building target 082-e2fsprogs [+-make[1]: [082-e2fsprogs] Erro 127 ] 0 min. 1 sec
make[1]: Saindo do diretório `/mnt/sis/jhalfs' make: [mk_SUDO] Erro 2 jhalfs [ /mnt/sis/jhalfs ]$
Note: sis is the BUILD_DIR
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
also, for the record, clfs standard 1.2.0 doesn't exist yet, it's a future milestone.
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
But the program retrieves the commands from the xml code of the book, if a failure occurs can be either the program as the xml code book.
About the milestone, which identify the relationship between milestones and version registered in CLFS trac?
Sorry about my persistence in this subjects, but the last time I installed a gnu/linux from the scratch was the LFS 6.1.
I had an interest in installing the CLFS recently seemed interesting the use of a tool like jhalfs to save time in the process.
I believe that even though perhaps boring, notes like mines, may help in the identification of problems that you and other developers of CLFS may not be aware that occur.
If the team of CLFS has no interest in this type of note, please let me know. I have no interest to be hampering the work of anyone.
Please report non-clfs errors when using jhalfs to jhalfs, not clfs, reporting it here will not get it fixed.