Changeset 9f08378 for BOOK/final-system/common/pkgmgt.xml

Timestamp:

May 17, 2006, 1:20:04 PM (18 years ago)

Author:

Jim Gifford <clfs@…>

Branches:

clfs-1.2, clfs-2.1, clfs-3.0.0-systemd, clfs-3.0.0-sysvinit, master, systemd, sysvinit

Children:

13bd751

Parents:

76246b3

Message:

r3564@server (orig r1629): chris | 2006-05-17 13:05:26 -0700
More text updates, mostly to change LFS references to CLFS

File:

• BOOK/final-system/common/pkgmgt.xml (modified) (5 diffs)

BOOK/final-system/common/pkgmgt.xml

@@ -11 +11 @@
   <title>Package Management</title>
 
-  <para>Package Management is an often requested addition to the LFS Book. A
+  <para>Package Management is an often-requested addition to the CLFS Book. A
   Package Manager allows tracking the installation of files making it easy to
   remove and upgrade packages. Before you begin to wonder, NO&mdash;this section
@@ -20 +20 @@
   issues that may arise when upgrading packages.</para>
 
-  <para>Some reasons why no specific package manager is recommended in LFS or
-  BLFS include:</para>
+  <para>Some reasons why no specific package manager is recommended in
+  CLFS or BLFS include:</para>
 
   <itemizedlist>
@@ -44 +44 @@
 
     <para>A Package Manager makes it easy to upgrade to newer versions when they
-    are released. Generally the instructions in the LFS and BLFS Book can be
+    are released. Generally the instructions in the CLFS and BLFS Book can be
     used to upgrade to the newer versions. Here are some points that you should
     be aware of when upgrading packages, especially on a running system.</para>
@@ -51 +51 @@
       <listitem>
         <para>If one of the toolchain packages (Glibc, GCC or Binutils) needs
-        to be upgraded to a newer minor version, it is safer to rebuild LFS.
-        Though, you <emphasis>may</emphasis> be able to get by rebuilding all
-        the packages in their dependency order, we do not recommend it. For
-        example, if glibc-2.2.x needs to be updated to glibc-2.3.x, it is safer
-        to rebuild. For micro version updates, a simple reinstallation usually
-        works, but is not guaranteed. For example, upgrading from glibc-2.3.4
-        to glibc-2.3.5 will not usually cause any problems.</para>
+        to be upgraded to a newer minor version, it is safer to
+        rebuild CLFS. Though you <emphasis>may</emphasis> be able to get by
+        rebuilding all the packages in their dependency order, we do not
+        recommend it. For example, if glibc-2.2.x needs to be updated to
+        glibc-2.3.x, it is safer to rebuild. For micro version updates, a
+        simple reinstallation usually works, but is not guaranteed. For
+        example, upgrading from glibc-2.3.4 to glibc-2.3.5 will not
+        usually cause any problems.</para>
       </listitem>
 
@@ -229 +230 @@
       <title>User Based Management</title>
 
-      <para>This scheme, unique to LFS, was devised by Matthias Benkmann, and is
+      <para>This scheme, unique to the LFS project, was devised by Matthias Benkmann, and is
       available from the <ulink url="&hints-root;">Hints Project</ulink>. In
       this scheme, each package is installed as a separate user into the